Jindal Poly Film – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹1,083 Cr | ▼ 12% | ₹1,233 Cr | ▼ 24% | ₹1,420 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹3.55 Cr | ▼ 90% | ₹35.4 Cr | ▼ 94% | ₹56.4 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹36.5 Cr | ▼ 63% | ₹168 Cr | ▲ Positive | -₹179 Cr |
| EPS | ₹8.42 | ▼ 78% | ₹38.38 | ▲ Positive | -₹40.87 |
Verdict
Jindal Poly Film posted a weak set of numbers in Q1 FY26 with sharp year-on-year declines across sales, EBITDA, profit, and EPS as core performance deteriorated. On a quarter-on-quarter basis, profitability improved due to positive net profit compared to last quarter’s loss, but operational margins remain under heavy pressure.
Orient Green – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹87.4 Cr | ▲ 38% | ₹63.4 Cr | ▲ 111% | ₹41.5 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹60.1 Cr | ▲ 47% | ₹40.8 Cr | ▲ 285% | ₹15.6 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹28.6 Cr | ▲ 380% | ₹6.0 Cr | Turnaround | -₹15.1 Cr |
| EPS | ₹0.25 | ▲ 317% | ₹0.06 | Turnaround | -₹0.14 |
Verdict
Orient Green delivered a stellar Q1 FY26 with sharp improvement in revenue, margins, and profitability. The company turned strongly profitable compared to last quarter’s loss, with robust year-on-year growth across all metrics.
RRP Semiconductor – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹0.00 Cr | ▼ 100% | ₹5.11 Cr | ▼ 100% | ₹6.00 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹-0.14 Cr | ▼ 108% | ₹1.82 Cr | ▼ 110% | ₹1.46 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹-0.29 Cr | ▼ 117% | ₹1.68 Cr | ▲ 82% (loss reduction) | ₹-1.59 Cr |
| EPS | ₹-0.21 | ▼ 117% | ₹1.23 | ▲ 82% (improvement) | ₹-1.17 |
Verdict
RRP Semiconductor reported zero revenues and operating losses in Q1 FY26, showing a sharp YoY decline across all metrics. However, QoQ losses narrowed, indicating some cost control. With an extremely high P/E (815x) despite negative earnings, valuations remain stretched, and investors may need to stay cautious until revenue visibility improves.
Zaggle Prepaid – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹331 Cr | ▲ 31% | ₹252 Cr | ▼ 19% | ₹411 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹30.9 Cr | ▲ 38% | ₹22.4 Cr | ▼ 16% | ₹36.6 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹25.9 Cr | ▲ 55% | ₹16.7 Cr | ▼ 19% | ₹32.0 Cr |
| EPS | ₹1.93 | ▲ 41% | ₹1.37 | ▼ 19% | ₹2.38 |
Verdict
Zaggle delivered strong year-on-year growth across all key metrics, reflecting improved scale and profitability. However, the quarter saw a sequential decline in revenue and earnings, suggesting some moderation after a high March quarter. At the current price of ₹367 (PE 51x), valuations remain rich, making it a hold for long-term investors, with near-term performance hinging on sustained growth momentum.
Patanjali Foods – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹8,900 Cr | ▲ 24% | ₹7,177 Cr | ▼ 8% | ₹9,692 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹321 Cr | ▼ 22% | ₹410 Cr | ▼ 38% | ₹516 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹180 Cr | ▼ 31% | ₹263 Cr | ▼ 50% | ₹359 Cr |
| EPS | ₹4.98 | ▼ 31% | ₹7.26 | ▼ 50% | ₹9.90 |
Verdict
Despite healthy top-line growth, Patanjali Foods faced margin pressure leading to sharp declines in EBITDA and profitability both YoY and QoQ. Elevated valuations (PE 52.5) suggest limited near-term upside unless margins recover.
Roto Pumps – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹65.9 Cr | ▲ 14% | ₹57.6 Cr | ▼ 17% | ₹79.0 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹13.6 Cr | ▲ 13% | ₹12.0 Cr | ▼ 33% | ₹20.3 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹6.3 Cr | ▲ 14% | ₹5.62 Cr | ▼ 50% | ₹12.5 Cr |
| EPS | ₹0.33 | ▲ 14% | ₹0.29 | ▼ 51% | ₹0.68 |
Verdict
Roto Pumps reported steady year-on-year growth across all key metrics, reflecting healthy demand momentum. However, quarter-on-quarter performance weakened due to a high base in the previous quarter and margin pressures, leading to sharp declines in profitability. The stock at ₹89 (PE 49x, M.Cap ₹1,678 Cr) looks fairly valued, with growth visibility but limited room for near-term upside unless margins recover.
Swan Energy – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
Price: ₹433 | M.Cap: ₹13,584 Cr | PE: 22.1
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹1,213 Cr | ▲ 6% | ₹1,142 Cr | ▲ 42% | ₹856 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹26.8 Cr | ▼ 93% | ₹381 Cr | ▲ 93% | ₹13.9 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹27.0 Cr | ▼ 86% | ₹268 Cr | Turnaround from Loss | ₹-22.4 Cr |
| EPS | ₹0.61 | ▼ 86% | ₹4.43 | Improved from Loss | ₹-0.57 |
Verdict
Swan Energy reported strong revenue growth both YoY and QoQ. However, profitability sharply declined YoY due to margin pressures, though there was a notable QoQ recovery from losses. Investors should watch for consistency in earnings before re-rating.
Sadbhav Engineering – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹222 Cr | ▼ 26% | ₹301 Cr | ▼ 23% | ₹290 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹147 Cr | ▲ 48% | ₹99 Cr | ▲ 61% | ₹91.4 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹31.2 Cr | ▲ 134% | ₹-30.7 Cr | Turnaround | ₹-165 Cr |
| EPS | ₹0.71 | ▲ 134% | ₹-2.08 | Improved | ₹-9.01 |
Verdict
Despite weaker sales, Sadbhav Engineering delivered a strong operational and financial turnaround in Q1 FY26 with sharp improvement in EBITDA and a return to profitability. The recovery in margins and earnings indicates effective cost control and improved execution, though sustaining sales growth remains the key challenge.
Vodafone Idea – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value (Jun 2025) | YoY Change | YoY Base (Jun 2024) | QoQ Change | QoQ Base (Mar 2025) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹11,022 Cr | ▲ 5% | ₹10,508 Cr | ▲ 0% | ₹11,014 Cr |
| EBIDT | ₹4,612 Cr | ▲ 10% | ₹4,205 Cr | ▼ 1% | ₹4,660 Cr |
| Net Profit | -₹6,608 Cr | ▼ 3% | -₹6,432 Cr | ▲ 8% | -₹7,166 Cr |
| EPS | ₹ -0.61 | ▲ 36% | ₹ -0.95 | ▲ 39% | ₹ -1.00 |
Verdict
Vodafone Idea reported modest revenue and EBITDA growth on a year-on-year basis in Q1 FY26, but net losses remain significant. QoQ performance showed stable sales, a slight decline in EBITDA, and an improvement in net loss and EPS, reflecting ongoing challenges but some progress on operational efficiency.
Jindal Worldwide – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹540 Cr | ▲ 10% | ₹492 Cr | ▼ 11% | ₹606 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹40.3 Cr | ▼ 14% | ₹46.7 Cr | ▼ 18% | ₹49.0 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹17.4 Cr | ▼ 3% | ₹18.1 Cr | ▼ 21% | ₹22.0 Cr |
| EPS | ₹0.17 | ▼ 6% | ₹0.18 | ▼ 23% | ₹0.22 |
Verdict
Jindal Worldwide posted modest revenue growth YoY, but profitability weakened with lower EBITDA, net profit, and EPS. QoQ performance shows sharper declines, indicating margin pressures and subdued demand momentum.
DCM – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
Price: ₹99.8 | M.Cap: ₹186 Cr | PE: 7.3
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹17.6 Cr | ▼ 4% | ₹18.4 Cr | ▲ 6% | ₹16.6 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹1.27 Cr | ▲ 22% | ₹1.04 Cr | Turnaround (Loss ₹0.30 Cr) | ₹-0.30 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹3.24 Cr | ▲ 1217% | ₹-0.29 Cr | ▲ 245% | ₹0.94 Cr |
| EPS | ₹1.73 | ▲ 1181% | ₹-0.16 | ▲ 246% | ₹0.50 |
Verdict
DCM delivered a strong turnaround with sharp profitability improvement both YoY and QoQ. Margins expanded significantly as EBITDA turned positive, while net profit surged multi-fold. Sales growth remains modest, but the earnings recovery reflects operational efficiency and improved cost control.
Jai Corp – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹131 Cr | ▲ 9% | ₹121 Cr | ▼ 3% | ₹135 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹8.2 Cr | ▼ 40% | ₹13.6 Cr | ▼ 20% | ₹10.2 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹104 Cr | ▲ 659% | ₹13.7 Cr | ▲ 346% | ₹23.3 Cr |
| EPS | ₹5.84 | ▲ 658% | ₹0.77 | ▲ 349% | ₹1.30 |
Verdict
Jai Corp delivered an exceptional bottom-line performance with massive YoY and QoQ growth in net profit and EPS, driven by exceptional gains. However, operating performance was weak with EBITDA declining sharply both YoY and QoQ. The results highlight strong profitability but with concerns on core operations.
JP Associates – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
Price: ₹4.23 | M.Cap: ₹1,038 Cr
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹672 Cr | ▼ 60% | ₹1,671 Cr | ▼ 41% | ₹1,137 Cr |
| EBITDA | -₹18.7 Cr | ▼ 114% | ₹135 Cr | ▲ 90% | -₹194 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹232 Cr | ▲ 261% | -₹1,026 Cr | ▲ 132% | -₹731 Cr |
| EPS | ₹0.98 | ▲ 124% | -₹4.17 | ▲ 136% | -₹2.69 |
Verdict
JP Associates reported weak revenue and EBITDA performance, but posted a surprising turnaround in net profit and EPS both YoY and QoQ, driven by exceptional gains. Core operations remain under stress with declining sales, but bottom-line recovery provides temporary relief.
Panacea Biotec – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹167 Cr | ▲ 44% | ₹116 Cr | ▲ 26% | ₹133 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹-1.18 Cr | ▲ 92% | ₹-14.0 Cr | ▲ 96% | ₹-26.9 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹3.96 Cr | ▲ 74% | ₹-15.9 Cr | ▲ 299% | ₹-1.99 Cr |
| EPS | ₹0.66 | ▲ 126% | ₹-2.58 | ▲ 313% | ₹-0.31 |
Verdict
Panacea Biotec reported a strong turnaround in Q1 FY26 with revenue growth and significant improvement in profitability. Losses have narrowed sharply, and the company posted a positive net profit and EPS after consecutive losses, reflecting improving operations and margin recovery.
Premier Energy – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹0 Cr | – | – | – | – |
| EBITDA | -₹0.30 Cr | ▲ 51% | -₹0.61 Cr | ▼ 25% | -₹0.24 Cr |
| Net Profit | -₹0.30 Cr | ▲ 14% | -₹0.35 Cr | ▼ 141% | ₹0.73 Cr |
| EPS | -₹0.07 | ▲ 12% | -₹0.08 | ▼ 139% | ₹0.18 |
Verdict
Premier Energy continues to operate without revenue, but losses have narrowed on a year-on-year basis. However, quarter-on-quarter performance deteriorated due to a swing from profit in Mar 2025 to loss in Jun 2025. The stock remains highly speculative given the absence of sales and elevated valuation (PE 145x).
Inox Green – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹56.2 Cr | ▲ 10% | ₹50.9 Cr | ▼ 18% | ₹68.4 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹6.12 Cr | ▼ 64% | ₹16.9 Cr | ▲ 603% | ₹0.87 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹22.4 Cr | ▲ 2487% | ₹4.14 Cr | ▲ 248% | ₹6.44 Cr |
| EPS | ₹0.60 | ▲ 362% | ₹0.13 | ▲ 300% | ₹0.15 |
Verdict
Inox Green delivered exceptional profitability growth with a massive jump in net profit and EPS both YoY and QoQ, supported by sharp margin recovery despite lower sequential sales. The strong turnaround highlights improving operational efficiency and earnings momentum.
S P Apparels – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹403 Cr | ▲ 64% | ₹245 Cr | ▲ 1% | ₹399 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹52.9 Cr | ▲ 60% | ₹33.0 Cr | ▼ 2% | ₹54.2 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹21.4 Cr | ▲ 18% | ₹18.0 Cr | ▼ 30% | ₹30.4 Cr |
| EPS | ₹8.53 | ▲ 18% | ₹7.20 | ▼ 30% | ₹12.12 |
Verdict
S P Apparels delivered strong year-on-year growth in sales, EBITDA, and profitability, reflecting robust demand. However, quarter-on-quarter softness in EBITDA and a sharp decline in net profit and EPS indicate margin pressures or higher costs in Q1 FY26. Overall, long-term growth momentum remains intact, but near-term earnings need close monitoring.
Sasken Technologies – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹274 Cr | ▲ 122% | ₹123 Cr | ▲ 85% | ₹148 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹14.6 Cr | ▲ 182% | ₹5.2 Cr | ▲ 106% | ₹7.08 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹10.0 Cr | ▼ 47% | ₹17.7 Cr | ▼ 13% | ₹11.5 Cr |
| EPS | ₹6.24 | ▼ 48% | ₹12.04 | ▼ 14% | ₹7.29 |
Verdict
Sasken delivered strong revenue and EBITDA growth, reflecting robust operational momentum. However, profitability declined sharply YoY and QoQ, indicating margin pressures despite top-line expansion. Sustained revenue traction needs to be matched with margin improvement for earnings stability.
Redtape – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹464 Cr | ▲ 5% | ₹442 Cr | ▼ 8% | ₹505 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹77 Cr | ▲ 12% | ₹68.5 Cr | ▼ 5% | ₹81.3 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹38.6 Cr | ▲ 26% | ₹30.6 Cr | ▼ 7% | ₹41.5 Cr |
| EPS | ₹0.70 | ▲ 27% | ₹0.55 | ▼ 7% | ₹0.75 |
Verdict
Redtape delivered strong year-on-year growth across all metrics, showcasing margin expansion and earnings strength. However, the sequential decline in sales and profits indicates some near-term softness. At CMP ₹121 (P/E 37.4, M.Cap ₹6,665 Cr), valuations remain on the higher side, suggesting cautious accumulation on dips.
Prakash Pipes – Q1 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹203 Cr | ▼ 1% | ₹205 Cr | ▲ 11% | ₹183 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹16.3 Cr | ▼ 50% | ₹32.9 Cr | ▼ 7% | ₹17.5 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹10.3 Cr | ▼ 59% | ₹25.4 Cr | Flat | ₹10.3 Cr |
| EPS | ₹4.31 | ▼ 59% | ₹10.62 | Flat | ₹4.30 |
Verdict
Prakash Pipes posted weak YoY performance with sharp declines in EBITDA and net profit due to margin pressure, though sales improved sequentially. QoQ earnings remained stagnant, reflecting near-term challenges in profitability despite modest revenue recovery.
