Sona BLW – Q2 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Reported | YoY Change | YoY Base | Vs Estimate | Estimate | Miss / Beat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹1,138 Cr | ▲ 23.4% | ₹922 Cr | ▲ 4.7% | ₹1,087 Cr | Beat |
| EBITDA | ₹283.6 Cr | ▲ 12.6% | ₹251.9 Cr | ▲ 9.1% | ₹260 Cr | Beat |
| EBITDA Margin | 24.9% | ▼ from 27.3% | 27.3% | ▲ from 23.9% | 23.9% | Beat |
| Net Profit | ₹173 Cr | ▲ 20% | ₹152 Cr | ▲ 7.5% | ₹161 Cr | Beat |
Verdict
Sona BLW delivered a strong Q2 FY26 performance, surpassing street estimates across all key metrics. Despite a marginal year-on-year decline in margins, the company maintained robust profitability with healthy growth in revenue and EBITDA, reflecting operational resilience and demand recovery.
Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) – Q2 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Reported | QoQ Change | QoQ Base | vs Estimate | Estimate | Miss/Beat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹1.79 Lakh Cr | ▼ 7% | ₹1.92 Lakh Cr | ▲ 1.1% | ₹1.77 Lakh Cr | Beat |
| EBITDA | ₹14,583 Cr | ▲ 15.7% | ₹12,607 Cr | ▲ 11.1% | ₹13,124 Cr | Beat |
| Net Profit | ₹7,610 Cr | ▲ 33.8% | ₹5,688 Cr | ▲ 19.8% | ₹6,353 Cr | Beat |
| EBITDA Margin | 8.2% | ▲ 170 bps | 6.5% | ▲ 80 bps | 7.4% | Beat |
Verdict
IOC delivered a strong Q2 FY26 performance, beating street estimates across all key metrics. Despite lower revenue, profitability improved sharply with higher margins and robust EBITDA growth, signaling better operational efficiency and stronger refining margins.
SRF – Q2 FY26 Earnings Highlights
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | Vs CNBC-TV18 Poll | Poll Estimate | Miss/Beat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | ₹3,640 Cr | ▲ 6.3% | ₹3,424 Cr | ▼ 5.5% | ₹3,852 Cr | Miss |
| EBITDA | ₹774 Cr | ▲ 44% | ₹538 Cr | ▼ 7.5% | ₹837 Cr | Miss |
| Net Profit | ₹388 Cr | ▲ 93% | ₹201 Cr | ▼ 14.5% | ₹454 Cr | Miss |
| EBITDA Margin | 21.3% | ▲ from 15.7% | 15.7% | ▼ vs 21.7% | 21.7% | Slight Miss |
Verdict
SRF delivered strong year-on-year growth in revenue, profitability, and margins driven by robust performance across key segments. However, results came in below analyst estimates, reflecting some near-term softness versus expectations despite a strong operational recovery.
PNB Housing – Q2 FY26 Earnings Highlights
Price: ₹928 | M.Cap: ₹24,151 Cr | PE: 11.0
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹2,168 Cr | ▲ 16% | ₹1,868 Cr | ▲ 5% | ₹2,064 Cr |
| EBIDT | ₹2,084 Cr | ▲ 20% | ₹1,738 Cr | ▲ 8% | ₹1,928 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹626 Cr | ▲ 33% | ₹472 Cr | ▲ 18% | ₹532 Cr |
| EPS | ₹24.05 | ▲ 33% | ₹18.15 | ▲ 18% | ₹20.44 |
Verdict
PNB Housing delivered a strong Q2 FY26 performance with double-digit growth across all key metrics. Both year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter improvements reflect sustained business momentum, margin expansion, and healthy profit traction — reinforcing its position as a resilient player in the housing finance space.
Indus Towers – Q2 FY26 Earnings Highlights
Price: ₹371 | M.Cap: ₹1,00,091 Cr | PE: 10.7
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹8,188 Cr | ▲ 10% | ₹7,465 Cr | ▲ 2% | ₹8,058 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹4,572 Cr | ▼ 6% | ₹4,864 Cr | ▲ 4% | ₹4,390 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹1,839 Cr | ▼ 17% | ₹2,224 Cr | ▲ 6% | ₹1,737 Cr |
| EPS | ₹6.83 | ▼ 17% | ₹8.25 | ▲ 6% | ₹6.44 |
Verdict
Indus Towers reported moderate revenue growth YoY but faced margin pressure, leading to a decline in EBITDA and profitability. However, the sequential recovery in all key metrics indicates improving operational performance and cost control in Q2 FY26.
KFin Technologies – Q2 FY26 Earnings Highlights
Price: ₹1,169 | M.Cap: ₹20,134 Cr | PE: 58.2
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹309 Cr | ▲ 10% | ₹280 Cr | ▲ 13% | ₹274 Cr |
| EBIDT | ₹136 Cr | ▲ 7% | ₹127 Cr | ▲ 19% | ₹114 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹93.3 Cr | ▲ 4% | ₹89.3 Cr | ▲ 21% | ₹77.3 Cr |
| EPS | ₹5.42 | ▲ 4% | ₹5.21 | ▲ 21% | ₹4.49 |
Verdict
KFin Technologies delivered steady year-on-year growth and strong sequential momentum in Q2 FY26. Revenue and profitability expanded both YoY and QoQ, reflecting healthy business traction, operating leverage, and continued demand for registrar and transfer agency services.
Canara HSBC – Q2 FY26 Earnings Highlights
Price: ₹122 | M.Cap: ₹11,540 Cr | PE: 95.6
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹2,348 Cr | ▼ 29% | ₹3,323 Cr | ▼ 35% | ₹3,632 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹15.8 Cr | ▲ 154% | ₹6.19 Cr | ▲ 148% | ₹6.36 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹40.8 Cr | ▲ 11% | ₹36.9 Cr | ▲ 74% | ₹23.4 Cr |
| EPS | ₹0.43 | ▲ 10% | ₹0.39 | ▲ 72% | ₹0.25 |
Verdict
Canara HSBC delivered a strong Q2 FY26 performance on the profitability front, with EBITDA and net profit showing triple-digit and robust double-digit growth, respectively. Despite a sharp decline in sales both YoY and QoQ, improved operational efficiency and margin expansion supported earnings.
Bata India – Q2 FY26 Earnings Highlights
Price: ₹1,166 | M.Cap: ₹14,996 Cr | PE: 80.6
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹801 Cr | ▼ 4% | ₹837 Cr | ▼ 15% | ₹942 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹145 Cr | ▼ 17% | ₹174 Cr | ▼ 27% | ₹199 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹13.9 Cr | ▼ 64% | ₹52.0 Cr | ▼ 73% | ₹52.0 Cr |
| EPS | ₹1.08 | ▼ 73% | ₹4.04 | ▼ 73% | ₹4.05 |
Verdict
Bata India reported a weak Q2 FY26 performance, with both revenue and profitability under pressure. The company saw a steep decline in net profit and EPS due to subdued demand and rising costs. Margin compression and slower consumer spending weighed on earnings, signaling near-term challenges in recovery momentum.
Raymond – Q2 FY26 Earnings Highlights
Price: ₹591 | M.Cap: ₹3,934 Cr | PE: 21.1
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹528 Cr | ▲ 11% | ₹474 Cr | ▲ 1% | ₹524 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹43.0 Cr | ▲ 73% | ₹24.9 Cr | ▼ 21% | ₹54.2 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹13.9 Cr | ▲ 6800% | ₹0.20 Cr* | ▲ 161% | ₹5.33 Cr |
| EPS | ₹1.71 | ▼ 81% | ₹9.02 | ▼ 100% | ₹799.58** |
Verdict
Raymond’s Q2 FY26 results showed strong year-on-year improvement in profitability, supported by a sharp rebound from a low base. However, sequentially, margins and earnings normalized after an exceptional previous quarter. The YoY surge in net profit reflects a turnaround, but the company’s performance is stabilizing on a quarterly basis.
*Derived from 6800% YoY growth.
**Exceptional Q1 EPS likely includes one-off income (e.g., demerger gain).
Adani Energy Solutions – Q2 FY26 Earnings Highlights
Price: ₹946 | M.Cap: ₹1,13,653 Cr | PE: 50.4
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹6,596 Cr | ▲ 7% | ₹6,184 Cr | ▼ 3% | ₹6,819 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹1,955 Cr | ▲ 14% | ₹1,715 Cr | ▲ 8% | ₹1,811 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹557 Cr | ▼ 21% | ₹773 Cr | ▲ 3% | ₹539 Cr |
| EPS | ₹4.44 | ▼ 21% | ₹5.62 | ▲ 4% | ₹4.27 |
Verdict
Adani Energy Solutions posted a moderate topline growth with healthy sequential improvement in EBITDA. However, profitability remained lower year-on-year due to higher costs and base effects. The quarter reflected stable operational performance despite softer YoY earnings.
JK Tyre & Industries – Q2 FY26 Earnings Highlights
Price: ₹412 | M.Cap: ₹11,291 Cr | PE: 20.7
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹4,011 Cr | ▲ 11% | ₹3,622 Cr | ▲ 4% | ₹3,869 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹521 Cr | ▲ 24% | ₹421 Cr | ▲ 30% | ₹402 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹227 Cr | ▲ 59% | ₹140 Cr | ▲ 39% | ₹163 Cr |
| EPS | ₹8.08 | ▲ 64% | ₹4.93 | ▲ 34% | ₹6.03 |
Verdict
JK Tyre delivered a robust Q2 FY26 performance, marked by strong double-digit growth in revenue, EBITDA, and profit. Sequentially, the company sustained momentum with notable margin expansion and healthy earnings improvement, reflecting solid operational efficiency and demand resilience across segments.
Mahindra Logistics – Q2 FY26 Earnings Highlights
Price: ₹354 | M.Cap: ₹3,509 Cr
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹1,685 Cr | ▲ 11% | ₹1,521 Cr | ▲ 4% | ₹1,625 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹85.1 Cr | ▲ 28% | ₹66.4 Cr | ▲ 12% | ₹76.2 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹-8.36 Cr | ▼ Loss 4% | ₹-9.61 Cr | ▼ Loss 11% | ₹-9.44 Cr |
| EPS | ₹-1.04 | ▼ Loss 4% | ₹-1.08 | ▼ Loss 5% | ₹-1.09 |
Verdict
Mahindra Logistics reported strong revenue and operating profit growth both year-on-year and sequentially, showcasing improved cost efficiency and stable operations. While the company remains in a loss, narrowing losses indicate progress toward breakeven and margin recovery.
Jubilant Ingrevia – Q2 FY26 Earnings Highlights
Price: ₹677 | Market Cap: ₹10,805 Cr | P/E: 37.5
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹1,121 Cr | ▲ 7% | ₹1,045 Cr | ▲ 8% | ₹1,038 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹135 Cr | ▲ 9% | ₹124 Cr | ▼ 5% | ₹142 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹69.5 Cr | ▲ 18% | ₹59.0 Cr | ▼ 7% | ₹75.1 Cr |
| EPS | ₹4.36 | ▲ 18% | ₹3.70 | ▼ 7% | ₹4.71 |
Verdict
Jubilant Ingrevia delivered steady year-on-year growth in Q2 FY26, with strong improvement in revenue and profitability compared to last year. However, sequentially, margins and profit softened slightly due to lower EBITDA and net profit on a quarterly basis. Overall, the company continues to show consistent operational performance and healthy earnings trajectory.
Tata Investment Corporation – Q2 FY26 Earnings Highlights
Price: ₹837 | M.Cap: ₹42,427 Cr | P/E: 120.6
| Metric | Q2 FY26 | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹154 Cr | ▲ 8% | ₹142 Cr | ▲ 6% | ₹145 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹144 Cr | ▲ 8% | ₹133 Cr | ▲ 7% | ₹134 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹148 Cr | ▲ 20% | ₹124 Cr | ▲ 1% | ₹146 Cr |
| EPS | ₹2.93 | ▲ 20% | ₹2.44 | ▲ 1% | ₹2.89 |
Sumitomo Chemical India – Q2 FY26 Earnings Highlights
Price: ₹518 | M.Cap: ₹25,823 Cr | P/E: 47.8
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹914 Cr | ▼ 6% | ₹971 Cr | ▼ 13% | ₹1,048 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹217 Cr | ▼ 10% | ₹242 Cr | ▼ 1% | ₹220 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹178 Cr | ▼ 7% | ₹191 Cr | ▼ 1% | ₹180 Cr |
| EPS | ₹3.56 | ▼ 7% | ₹3.82 | ▼ 1% | ₹3.60 |
Verdict
Sumitomo Chemical India reported a muted Q2 FY26 with declines across sales, EBITDA, and profitability both year-on-year and sequentially. The subdued performance reflects ongoing challenges in the agrochemical sector, with limited demand recovery. Margin pressures and weak top-line momentum remain key concerns in the near term.
Supreme Industries – Q2 FY26 Earnings Highlights
Price: ₹4,001 | M.Cap: ₹50,869 Cr | P/E: 60.0
| Metric | Value | YoY Change | YoY Base | QoQ Change | QoQ Base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | ₹2,394 Cr | ▲ 5% | ₹2,273 Cr | ▼ 8% | ₹2,609 Cr |
| EBITDA | ₹297 Cr | ▼ 7% | ₹319 Cr | ▼ 7% | ₹319 Cr |
| Net Profit | ₹165 Cr | ▼ 20% | ₹207 Cr | ▼ 18% | ₹202 Cr |
| EPS | ₹12.97 | ▼ 20% | ₹16.26 | ▼ 19% | ₹15.93 |
Verdict
Supreme Industries posted modest revenue growth but faced pressure on profitability in Q2 FY26. EBITDA and net profit declined both year-on-year and sequentially, reflecting margin compression amid softer demand or higher input costs. Overall, earnings momentum remained subdued this quarter.







